In an amazing Friday morning press conference in Washington DC, the National Rifle Association broke its weeklong silence following the horrific shooting of 26 people at a school in Newtown, CT and called for a surge of gun-carrying "good guys" around American schools.
NRA Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre called for a new kind of American domestic security revolving around armed civilians, arguing that "the only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun."
"We care about our president, so we protect him with armed Secret Service agents," LaPierre said. "Members of Congress work in offices surrounded by Capitol Police officers. Yet, when it comes to our most beloved, innocent, and vulnerable members of the American family, our children, we as a society leave them every day utterly defenseless, and the monsters and the predators of the world know it, and exploit it."
LaPierre's speech was a call to supporters to mobilize around a new vision of American domestic security, at a time when voices for gun control are steadily rising. On Friday morning before the press conference, President Obama released a video (above) citing a petition by hundreds of Americans calling for swift action.
At the grassroots level, groups like Newtown United, a group of Newtown neighbors, are working to address major issues related to the tragedy, including gun control, violent media, mental health and legislation.
Newtown locals responded to the NRA press conference. Suzy DeYoung, a Newtown parent, coach and resident for nine years who has three children, said LaPierre's speech was playing to people’s fears.
“People are much smarter than this,” DeYoung said. “He is saying we need to be protected from guns by more guns. This lack of logic speaks for itself, and I truly believe the response you are abut to see from parents all around the world will offer better commentary than I ever could."
Joanna Zachos, a mother in Sandy Hook, CT said that while she supports an increase in gun control and personally does not believe in guns at all, that the larger problem goes "way beyond that."
"The problem we have is our immunity to violence as a society as a whole," she said. "Violent video games, violent movies, addiction to horror films. We've developed immunity to violence and violent images."
LaPierre also lamented violence in video games, music videos and "blood-soaked" films. But his central solution seemed to be a great mobilization of gun-carrying "good guys," a term he used repeatedly but did not define, who might be more present and respond more quickly than police.
"If we truly cherish our kids, more than our money, more than our celebrities, more than our sports stadiums, we must give them the greatest level of protection possible," LaPierre said. "And that security is only available with properly trained, armed 'good guys'."
LaPierre, who was interrupted twice by protesters who held signs in front of TV cameras, made a direct call for local action.
"I call on every parent. I call on every teacher. I call on every school administrator, every law enforcement officer in this country, to join with us and help create a national schools shield safety program to protect our children with the only positive line of defense that’s tested and proven to work," he said.
LaPierre did not take questions from reporters, and did not acknowledge the protesters.
As for Mr. LaPierre, his was an unmitigated P.R. disaster! All he had to do, all he should have done, was express sympathy and commit the N.R.A. to dialogue. But what ensued was a spectacular display of complete arrogance and stupidity. What insurance company will ever insure the liabilty for having armed guns in schools? And who's going to pay the salaries, benefits, training etc? The already cash strapped property tax payer? Or is this just another example of the back door tax that conservatives like to impose all the while taking about less government and less taxes. Wayne LaPierre has proved himself to be nothing more than the nut that he is.
I am in Japan at this time,nobody has a gun here.The greater good of the community supersedes individual rights. One does not have to worry about personal safety in this country. Maybe we should consider interpreting and changing the second amendment. The legislators who ignore and vote against gun control are pandering to those constituents who want guns. Its the almighty vote.Lets get out and vote them out. Nancy C. Wasserman The only way to be safe is to have no guns at all.
Just because a mentality unstable person committed a horrific act, I should not have to have my guns taken away from me
It is amazing how the ignorant are trying to write laws to restrict the rights of the well-informed. Welcome to the rule of emotions and the low information voter.
Do you really want to quibble about the assault capabilities of the Bushmaster? It is a semi-automatic gun intended to kill people. The Bushmaster WAS BANNED in the 1994 and earlier laws as a duplicate AR15. See http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/103/hr4296/text So do you acknowledge contributing to the misinformation?
"...the Bushmaster .223 rifle, is a type of AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, certain models of which were prohibited from being sold under the ban, but the Bushmaster model used by Lanza was not on that list. " (http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/OTUS/newtown-connecticut-shootings-assault-weapons-ban-work/story?id=18000724) It isn't really that difficult for gun manufacturers (or manufacturers of any product) to read a law and specifically design the products that people want to fit the law. It happens all the time and will always happen. You also made a point about illegal gun sales at gun shows. So if I understand it you want to pass a law that makes illegal gun sales illegal. I am sure that idea will save many of lives.
I would prefer to have an armed law enforcement presence in my children's schools. There are armed guards in our airports, malls, jewelry stores, our political buildings etc. Why shouldn't parents have the right to protect the most important things in their lives... their children. If my home was under attack from intruders, I would want to have a high capacity weapon in my hands to save the lives of my family rather than to have to wait for 911 to come and rescue... by that time, it may be too late. Disarm the criminals, not the law abidding citizens.